Fred, I just showed this to my wife and her ifnerd and they were astonished. She thought that voting was about equal opportunity, that the images attendant should be multi-cultural, etc. Also, we thought the folks far-a-way look, the camera angle was strange and distancing.

Fred, I just showed this to my wife and her ifnerd and they were astonished. She thought that voting was about equal opportunity, that the images attendant should be multi-cultural, etc. Also, we thought the folks far-a-way look, the camera angle was strange and distancing.

February 26, 2012 at 9:02 amThis topic confuses me a bit what is an tedeiund photo?Is cropping, resizeing or straightening (all photos here are resized) considered editing?Is the HDR (or some other filter) from the camera edited photo?I think that the only tedeiund photo is RAW file from the camera But once it is converted to JPG (or some other format) in the camera or in PS, it is already edited photo.What you think?

Just goes to show that the Libtards are not hiding anhnyitg now that they are in power. They literally feelt that it is their right now that they are in control to further reveal how they plan to maintain control.In another time, in another place, people like Ed Schultz would be the first one against the wall. The rest of his ilk would have their heads on pikes along the path to the wall where he would be led to.

I live in Oregon and I have not been in a polling both for over 12 years but I have voted in every eticleon. I find your arguments to be absurd. I am not aware of any fraud cases since Oregon went to mail in ballots. As for secrecy, your ballot goes into an inner envelope which has no identification. You sign your name on the outer envelope and that signature is compared to the signature on file. If it checks out the inner envelope is processed. And keep in mind there is nothing sacred about the secret ballot it is relatively new and was originally implemented primarily to facilitate eticleon fraud. But I found this to be simply absurd:Rather, my point was about the effect of vote-by-mail schemes on voter secrecy. Imagine if an employer, who everyone knew to be a Republican, required his employees to request absentee ballots and show them to him before they were submitted. Think of an abusive husband who insists that he and his wife fill out their ballots together. Or imagine a political operative going around a low-income neighborhood paying people $50 if they let him fill out their ballots for them. This kind of corruption is very hard for voting officials to detect. And more insidious, voters themselves may not even realize that it’s unethical.Everything you list here would be a crime and in most cases would be caught.Why not just be honest here you oppose it because more poor and middle class people will vote which is bad for Republicans.